xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

APIC, NMI Watchdog

To: Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: APIC, NMI Watchdog
From: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:50:17 +0800 (PHT)
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108262008140.9916-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001 at 20:10, Seth Mos wrote:
> In that case I am going to add a note to the FAQ that it might be
> dangerous because the 3ware cards and 1.0 and 1.0.1 will probably not
> like each other if you switch it on. I will add a note that 2.4.9 and
> latter might work better then it does with the older kernel.

I am not quite sure if it happens with _all_ 3ware cards. Dan Yocum, who
does more tests and has access to a wider variety of 3ware controllers,
might want to corroborate my statements first before you add that FAQ
entry.

Aside from NMI Watchdog and the 3ware controller, it _might_ have been
APIC (which is a prerequisite of the NMI Watchdog support) for
uniprocessors and my VIA chipset.

So many possibilities. Sometimes I wonder why I have both APIC and NMI
Watchdog enabled. ;>

But just in case you want to know what happened circa 2.4.6 to 2.4.8:

 o 2.4.6 ~ 2.4.7 (estimates, I'm not quite sure _when_ it started
   because my drive didn't fail with every kernel increment): data
   corruption that had to be xfs_repair'd. I sent e-mail to the list
   about this.

 o 2.4.8: system freeze but no data corruption. I didn't send e-mail to
   the list about this but just rebooted the machine.

 --> Jijo

--
Federico Sevilla III  :: jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc.
GnuPG Key: <http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>