| To: | "Dr. Joe Krahn (Joe)" <krahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: About XFS-1.0.1 Kickstart |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:08:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | allenq@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200108242055.f7OKtIp06801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I would vote for that, except devfs is turned off in 1.0.1... :) -Eric "Dr. Joe Krahn (Joe)" wrote: > > I think the DAC960 problem relates to devfs (causes a lot > of new-user problems and maybe should be optional.) > The RAID device names are different, such as: > /dev/rd/disc0/part1 on my system. > You can also try the kernel option devfs=nomount, > but this might also cause problems with other parts > of the install process. -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: About XFS-1.0.1 Kickstart, Dr. Joe Krahn (Joe) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Tera-Byte+ fileservers, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: About XFS-1.0.1 Kickstart, Dr. Joe Krahn (Joe) |
| Next by Thread: | XFS/setfacl ordering bug still?, Eric Peters |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |