At 17:48 23-8-2001 +0200, Thomas Kirk wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:10:50PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
> XFS is nice for larger file sizes and also seems to do reasonably well
when
> using large databases.
Our HW diskarray are gonna be aprox 500gb and we will run raid5 on top
of that.Any considerations i should do if deploying XFS for the server?
Not really though, just use it. Make sure to compile with kgcc on redhat
7.1 or at least gcc-2.95.4 under debian and search out a gcc 2.91.66 if you
can.
That would be the first thing we ask when you have problems.
Don't use raid 5 if database performance is worth something to you.
BTW i seem to get 2 copies of all the mails from this list?
Because I use reply to all.
Not everyone is on the list. You can post to the list without subscribing.
Cheers
--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.
|