xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed.

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed.
From: Jean-Francois Landry <jflandry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 02:00:04 -0400
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108101811040.16293-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from knuffie@xxxxxxxxx on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 06:14:16PM +0200
References: <20010810100553.A25178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108101811040.16293-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jflandry@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 06:14:16PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
<<snip kernel messages>>

> > The file was created successfully though...but the messages do tend to
> > put me on edge a bit.  Copying a 64gb file from an NFS share to the
> > filesystem doesn't show any problems.
> 
> Probably because it does not push the system as much.
> 

Not quite entirely on topic but I got similar kernel messages once when
extracting a largish tarball (about 70000 files, my ~/mail in Maildir
format) on a reiserfs partition on kernel 2.4.7, so I'd say this is a
generic kernel MM problem. Nothing bad happened though.

Jean-Francois Landry
-- 
UNIX was not designed to stop its users from doing stupid things, 
as that would also stop them from doing clever things. 
        Doug Gwyn
--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>