| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: high load lockup |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:57:17 +1000 |
| Cc: | tridge@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Thu, 09 Aug 2001 09:13:20 EST." <200108091413.f79EDLR04185@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
0xf05a9704 0x80114952 schedule+0x406 (0xd3a3e0e0, 0x1)
kernel .text 0x80100000 0x8011454c 0x80114b60
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 09:13:20 -0500,
Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Hmm, I didn't know linux could survive a stack this deep!
The process table is 0xf05a8000-0xf05a9fff. The stack has got down to
0xf05a9704, struct task is about 0x800 bytes, still 0x0f00 bytes left.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Oracle 8.1.7_03 on RH 7.1 XFS 1.0 installer, Steven Tower |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS installer, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: high load lockup, Andrew Tridgell |
| Next by Thread: | bdflush (was: corrupt inode), Federico Sevilla III |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |