Re: xfsprogs support for > 1TB devices.

[Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:41:56AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > or maybe make it a unsigned long long right away..
> 
> There doesn't seem to be any point in doing that since the ioctl
> returns an unsigned long (or have I missed something?).  I think
> your "unsigned long long" suggestion would cause an xfsprogs bug
> on some 32bit platforms, no?

Yes. Sorry, I was not thinking clearly.

> Steve sent some mail discussing the size of XFS inode numbers in
> bits a little while ago that will be of interest to you too (see
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/mail_archive/0107/msg00727.html).

Yes, I know about that.

Thanks.


-- 
Ragnar Kjorstad
Big Storage