| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: non-standard errno: -990 |
| From: | Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:51:51 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20010809095021.A260586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20010808160948.D21284@xxxxxxx> <20010808223713.A1669@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010808170000.E21284@xxxxxxx> <20010809095021.A260586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:50:21AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > Only other suggestion would be to unmount and see what kind of > corruption xfs_repair picks up. I might be able to do that on the weekend. (Ugh. This working on the weekend thing is becoming a little too common for me...) Andrew Klaassen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | OT: WMware beta, Alan Eldridge |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: non-standard errno: -990, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |