Re: non-standard errno: -990

xfs

Re: non-standard errno: -990

To:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: non-standard errno: -990
From:	Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:45:44 -0400
In-reply-to:	<200108082103.f78L3wX02935@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References:	<200108082103.f78L3wX02935@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.3.18i

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 04:03:58PM -0500, 
Steve Lord wrote:

> >   kernel: XFS: bad magic number
> >   kernel: XFS: SB validate failed

> Well, both of these will result in a failed mount, so this is
> not the same filesystem. Also, if you get the 990 error, the
> filesystem should no longer be accessible, so something else
> is going on here.

Okay - double checked these errors, and yes, they are failed
mounts of a filesystem that's no longer there.

The filesystem giving the 990 error, though, is still
accessible...

Andrew Klaassen

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen Re: non-standard errno: -990, Eric Sandeen Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andi Kleen Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen Re: non-standard errno: -990, Steve Lord Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen Re: non-standard errno: -990, Seth Mos Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen <= Re: non-standard errno: -990, Nathan Scott Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen Re: non-standard errno: -990, Brian A Lauer Re: non-standard errno: -990, Seth Mos

Previous by Date:	Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen
Next by Date:	Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen
Previous by Thread:	Re: non-standard errno: -990, Andrew Klaassen
Next by Thread:	Re: non-standard errno: -990, Nathan Scott
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]