[Top] [All Lists]

Re: non-standard errno: -990

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: non-standard errno: -990
From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:37:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108090017060.27733-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108090017060.27733-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:23:05AM +0200, 
Seth Mos wrote:

> What compiler did you use? Some people had some weird issues
> with the redhat compiler differing from machine to machine.


There's one more compile note which may (or may not) be of
interest - I applied ide.2.4.7-p3.all.07092001.patch to the tree
after applying patch-2.4.7-xfs-2001-07-22.  (The tree was
initially virgin.)

> > ...the "-990" error, though, definitely seems to be
> > associated with a mounted filesystem...

> It must be to generate one :-)

But it's *still* mounted; that's the thing.  When I read in the
FAQ that this error means that XFS has shut the disk down, I
don't expect it to still be mounted...

> >   kernel: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ15.

> What is the parallel port doing on the second IDE controller
> IRQ?

I just put these extra kernel messages in for context.  This one
is harmless, as far as I can tell...


...as are the rest that I included.  Just normal bootup stuff.

This, though...

> >   kernel: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990

And this...

> >   os.mkdir(d, 0775) OSError: [Errno 990]
> >   Unknown error 990: 
> > '/n/bubba1/Projects/20_Million/COMP/scenes/hol183_8/film'

> You will have errors on this fs that will need repairing.
> Let's see if we can find some further clues.
> Do you see more messages with 990 in it in /var/log/messages?

Nope.  Just one.

Andrew Klaassen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>