| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problems with mkfs.xfs |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:56:56 +0200 |
| Cc: | XFS list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200108091337.f79Dbqq04067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:37:52AM -0500 |
| References: | <dv@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200108091337.f79Dbqq04067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi Steve, On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:37:52AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > There is unfortunately no workaround for this, XFS on a floppy would > have been a nice test bed for people, however, there are some minimum > sizes in XFS which prevent this. For deadlock reasons, the log must be > twice the size of the largest potential transaction we can have, this > makes the minimum log size 1200 4K blocks which is already over 4Mbytes. Just curious: which transaction could need 600 4K blocks? -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | high load lockup, Andrew Tridgell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problems with mkfs.xfs, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problems with mkfs.xfs, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problems with mkfs.xfs, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |