| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsprogs support for > 1TB devices. |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Aug 2001 11:03:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | Ragnar Kj?rstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010809114155.C260586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from nathans@xxxxxxx on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:41:56AM +1000 |
| References: | <20010809030249.C9580@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20010809114155.C260586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:41:56AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > I don't have access to a big enough Linux system to try it I'm > afraid, but the IRIX/XFS code is obviously 64 bit clean, so we > had a good starting point for Linux/XFS - the sorts of problems > you'll encounter are likely to be issues introduced during the > port from IRIX (like the above) or existing limitations in the > Linux block device layer. So, those issues aside, you shouldn't > see any problems with XFS >2Tb. ;-) You can simulate > 1TB block device on linux by using the loopback device with a holey backing file. Just don't fill it. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problems with mkfs.xfs, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How to make ext3+xfs kernel?, `matte |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsprogs support for > 1TB devices., Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfsprogs support for > 1TB devices., Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |