xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: non-standard errno: -990

To: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: non-standard errno: -990
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 09:50:21 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010808170000.E21284@xxxxxxx>; from ak@xxxxxxx on Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:00:00PM -0400
References: <20010808160948.D21284@xxxxxxx> <20010808223713.A1669@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010808170000.E21284@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:00:00PM -0400, Andrew Klaassen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:37:13PM +0200, 
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 04:09:48PM -0400,
> > Andrew Klaassen wrote:
> 
> > > I'm getting errors like this with a 2.4.7 XFS patched kernel:
> > > 
> > >   kernel: nfsd: non-standard errno: -990
> > > 
> > > This isn't something I'd worry about normally, but just a few
> > > minutes ago a programmer told me that he got a "990" error when
> > > trying to create a directory on the same XFS filesystem - and it
> > > *wasn't* over nfs.  I haven't been able to find any info via
> > > google.
> 
> > -990 is EFSCORRUPTED which XFS generates when it sees an nasty
> > error internally. You should probably have an error message
> > somewhere earlier in the logs.
> 
> ...
> 
> Any suggested course of action?  This is, unfortunately, a
> woefully undertested production drive...
> 

Only other suggestion would be to unmount and see what kind of
corruption xfs_repair picks up.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>