xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Kernel patches

from [Eric Sandeen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Charles R. Tersteeg" <wulvyrn@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Kernel patches
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 08:51:00 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <997232344.4784.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx 
"Charles R. Tersteeg" wrote:
> 
> would i be out of line to request patches in rpm format? for those of us
> who do not have the processor power to build such a large object?

Hm, patches are source code by definition, so it really doesn't make
sense to talk about "rpm format patches."

We do make RPMs available for major releases (1.0, 1.0.1) but RPMs of
development snapshots are not something we plan to offer.

-Eric

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Kernel patches, Charles R. Tersteeg
    • Re: Kernel patches, Eric Sandeen <=
Previous by Date:  RE: kernel nfsd crash, Christian, Chip
Next by Date:  Re: Future of XFS?, Steve Lord
Previous by Thread:  Kernel patches, Charles R. Tersteeg
Next by Thread:  Default ACL execute permission inheritance, Daniel J. Mastrian
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]