xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS fs size limit?

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS fs size limit?
From: Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:26:12 +0200
Cc: Derek Glidden <dglidden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108040001030.11177-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Seth Mos on Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:14:13AM +0200
References: <3B6AC5B9.45136565@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108040001030.11177-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
> > The 3ware cards are nice if you have a bunch of IDE disks lying around
> > and need space and like to be able to do hardware RAID, but if I were
> > building a mission-critical datastore, I'd definitely be using high-end
> > SCSI drives and a RAID controller I was *damn sure* was as bulletproof
> > as I could get.
> 
> You get logistical problems going larger then about 16 disks. I have 1
> production machine with software raid. Which is raid 1 to be able to keep
> going when one of the IDE disks in the server fails. Insert 100Mbit
> ethernet story again.
> 
> If you want large you can hook 180GB baracudas on a hardware raid
> controller (dual or quad channel) and bump into the 2TB
> partition/filesystem limit of linux.
> 
> Has anyone already bumped into that limit?

Yes, we have.

But this is getting awfully offtopic.


-- 
Ragnar Kjorstad
Big Storage


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>