xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Busy inodes after umount

To: Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Busy inodes after umount
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 13:30:22 -0500
Cc: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tad Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>, mjacob@xxxxxxxxx, Christian Chip <chip.christian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Comments: In-reply-to Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> message dated "Wed, 01 Aug 2001 20:05:50 +0200."
References: <20010719165758.D50024-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200107200038.TAA40153@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010731021546.A7750@xxxxxxxxxxx> <996653920.2941.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010801200550.B30796@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:18:40AM +0100, Tony Gale wrote:
> > Do you have any other patches in your kernel, such as grsecurity?
> 
> The only patch I have is the xfs patch.
> 
> 

I thought Trond pointed to a patch on linux-kernel this morning:

The NLM lock reclaiming code in the stock 2.4.x kernel is
incomplete. Please apply the patch on

   http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/2.4.7/linux-2.4.7-reclaim.dif

Cheers,
   Trond

Steve

> 
> -- 
> Ragnar Kjorstad
> Big Storage


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>