| To: | Utz Lehmann <leh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Constantin Loizides <Constantin.Loizides@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fragmentation of Journaling FS |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 01 Aug 2001 17:22:51 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs-list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010801165246.F1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3B680A34.C08783AC@xxxxxx> <3B67D35E.64877CBF@xxxxxx> <20010801144322.C1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B680A34.C08783AC@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 16:52 1-8-2001 +0200, Utz Lehmann wrote: Hi Constantin No sharp drop. That the elapsed time is reduced by the volume size is very interessting. On the 512MB volume it's only half of the 4GB volume. My test is very quick and very dirty. btw: For your agesystem you can maybe add following: - random file deletion - deletion of whole trees - simultaneous writing of files (very important, a lot of filesystems are fragmenting these files badly) - appending to files in different sized pieces (like logfiles) And after running those test using xfs_fsr to see if it helps :-) Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fragmentation of Journaling FS, Utz Lehmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fragmentation of Journaling FS, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fragmentation of Journaling FS, Utz Lehmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fragmentation of Journaling FS, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |