xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Insecure world writable files from XFS 1.0.1 ISO installer

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Insecure world writable files from XFS 1.0.1 ISO installer
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx>
Date: 02 Aug 2001 12:08:24 -0400
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <996768076.16844.10.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Organization: mkp.net
References: <200108021459.f72ExmB06735@jen.americas.sgi.com> <996765146.16847.3.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <yq1snfafoz9.fsf@jcb.mkp.net> <996768076.16844.10.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft)
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> writes:

Eric> On 02 Aug 2001 11:42:02 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> The Alpha installer uses the RedHat Alpha 2.4.3 RPM + XFS patches
>> but doesn't suffer from the problem.
>>
>> Do you have the anaconda-7.1-umask patch in the IA32 installer?

Eric> Hm, where might one find this patch?

In your mail.

In general the bits in the Alpha packages are slightly more recent
than in the IA32 versions.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen      Cereal Bowl Engineer, Linuxcare, Inc.
http://mkp.net/         SGI XFS, Linux/PA-RISC, GNOME


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>