| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID |
| From: | svetljo <galia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Aug 2001 22:58:17 +0200 |
| References: | <3B8E3F0E.8050609@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20010830083546.A20989@sistina.com> <3B8EC633.40202@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <3B8F8C5E.7030603@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20010831110512.V541@turbolinux.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010802 |
|
Hi i'm having a serios trouble with creating a LVM over software linear RAID well i created it, formated it with XFS but every time i try to mount the LV mount segfaults and then i can not mount any other file system ( partition, CD, .. until i reboot, when i try to mount smth mount simple stop to respond without an error and blocks the console i'm using XFS cvs kernel 2.4.9 and LVM-1.0.1rc1 on ABIT's BP6 2xCelleron 533 512Mb RAM the drives are on onboard HPT366 controler 2xWD 30Gb 1xMaxtor 40Gb the LV is striped over the 3 devices of the VG the VG is /dev/hdh10 /dev/md6 /dev/md7 /dev/md6 is linear software RAID /dev/hde6 /dev/hde12 /dev/md7 is linear software RAID /dev/hdg1 /dev/hdg5 /dev/hdg6 dev/hdg11 i posted to the LVM-lists and there i was told to try "dmesg | ksymoops" and i became the folowing answer > >>EIP; e29c0266 <[linear]linear_make_request+36/f0> <===== > >> Trace; c023fa12 <__make_request+412/6d0> >> Trace; c0278dcd <md_make_request+4d/80> >> Trace; c027fa0f <lvm_make_request_fn+f/20> >> Trace; c023fd89 <generic_make_request+b9/120> > >OK, so the oops is inside the RAID layer, but it may be that it is >being fed bogus data from a higher layer. Even so, it should not >oops in this case. Since XFS changes a lot of the kernel code, I >would either suggest asking the XFS folks to look at this oops, >or maybe on the MD RAID mailing list, as they will know more about it. this is the full "dmesg | ksymoops" , i'll try to use other FS to find out whether it's a problem with XFS, but i wish me not to have to use other FS, i realy love XFS
>>EIP; e29c0266 <[linear]linear_make_request+36/f0> <===== Trace; c023fa12 <__make_request+412/6d0> Trace; c0278dcd <md_make_request+4d/80> Trace; c027fa0f <lvm_make_request_fn+f/20> Trace; c023fd89 <generic_make_request+b9/120> Trace; c01a6814 <_pagebuf_page_io+1f4/370> Trace; c01a6a85 <_page_buf_page_apply+f5/1c0> Trace; c01a6fc1 <pagebuf_segment_apply+b1/e0> Trace; c01a6c47 <pagebuf_iorequest+f7/160> Trace; c01a6990 <_page_buf_page_apply+0/1c0> Trace; c0105dac <__down+bc/d0> Trace; c0105f1c <__down_failed+8/c> Trace; c02e2140 <stext_lock+45b4/99d6> Trace; c021c10a <xfsbdstrat+3a/40> Trace; c01fe5b8 <xlog_bread+48/80> Trace; c01ff2a4 <xlog_find_zeroed+94/1e0> Trace; c01a553e <_pagebuf_get_object+3e/170> Trace; c01feb6f <xlog_find_head+1f/370> Trace; c01feed8 <xlog_find_tail+18/350> Trace; c01fc322 <xlog_alloc_log+2a2/2e0> Trace; c0201f40 <xlog_recover+20/c0> Trace; c01fb8f3 <xfs_log_mount+73/b0> Trace; c0202fdf <xfs_mountfs+55f/e20> Trace; c02026bf <xfs_readsb+af/f0> Trace; c01a60be <pagebuf_rele+3e/80> Trace; c02026eb <xfs_readsb+db/f0> Trace; c021e674 <kmem_alloc+e4/110> Trace; c020b69c <xfs_cmountfs+4bc/590> Trace; c020b843 <xfs_mount+63/70> Trace; c020b871 <xfs_vfsmount+21/40> Trace; c021cf48 <linvfs_read_super+188/270> Trace; c01294e0 <filemap_nopage+2c0/410> Trace; c0125f0e <handle_mm_fault+ce/e0> Trace; c0125d9d <do_no_page+4d/f0> Trace; c013cd72 <read_super+72/110> Trace; c013d01b <get_sb_bdev+18b/1e0> Trace; c013dafc <do_add_mount+1dc/290> Trace; c01131e0 <do_page_fault+0/4b0> Trace; c010724c <error_code+34/3c> Trace; c013dd56 <do_mount+106/120> Trace; c013dbfc <copy_mount_options+4c/a0> Trace; c013de13 <sys_mount+a3/130> Trace; c010715b <system_call+33/38> Code; e29c0266 <[linear]linear_make_request+36/f0> 00000000 <_EIP>: Code; e29c0266 <[linear]linear_make_request+36/f0> <===== 0: f7 f9 idiv %ecx,%eax <===== Code; e29c0268 <[linear]linear_make_request+38/f0> 2: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx Code; e29c026a <[linear]linear_make_request+3a/f0> 4: 74 24 je 2a <_EIP+0x2a> e29c0290 <[linear]linear_make_request+60/f0> Code; e29c026c <[linear]linear_make_request+3c/f0> 6: 55 push %ebp Code; e29c026d <[linear]linear_make_request+3d/f0> 7: 51 push %ecx Code; e29c026e <[linear]linear_make_request+3e/f0> 8: 68 c0 03 9c e2 push $0xe29c03c0 Code; e29c0273 <[linear]linear_make_request+43/f0> d: e8 58 6c 75 dd call dd756c6a <_EIP+0xdd756c6a> c0116ed0 <printk+0/1a0> Code; e29c0278 <[linear]linear_make_request+48/f0> 12: 6a 00 push $0x0 Andreas Dilger wrote: >On Aug 31, 2001 15:08 +0200, svetljo wrote: > >>[root@svetljo mnt]# mount -t xfs /dev/myData/Music music >>Segmentation fault >> > >Generally this is a bad sign. Either mount is segfaulting (unlikely) >or you are getting an oops in the kernel. You need do run something >like "dmesg | ksymoops" in order to get some useful data about where >the problem is (could be xfs, LVM, or elsewhere in the kernel). > >Once you have an oops, you are best off rebooting the system, because >your kernel memory may be corrupted, and cause more oopses which do >not mean anything. If you look in /var/log/messages (or /var/log/kern.log >or some other place, depending on where kernel messages go), you can >decode the FIRST oops in the log with ksymoops. All subsequent ones are >useless. > > >>the LV ( lvcreate -i3 -I4 -L26G -nMusic ) >> >>the VG -> myData /dev/hdh10 /dev/linVG1/linLV1 /dev/linVG2/linLV2 >> >>/dev/hdh10 normal partition 14G >>/dev/linVG1/linLV1 -> linear LV 14G /dev/hde6 /dev/hde12 >>/dev/linVg2/linLV2 -> linear LV 14G /dev/hdg1 /dev/hdg5 /dev/hdg6 /dev/hdg12 >> > >There is absolutely no point in doing this (not that it is possible to do >so anyways). First of all, striping is almost never needed "for performance" >unless you are normally doing very large sequential I/Os, and even so most >disks today have very good sequential I/O rates (e.g. 15-30MB/s). Secondly, >you _should_ be able to just create a single LV that is striped across all >of the PVs above. You would likely need to build it in steps, to ensure >that it is striped across the disks correctly. > >Cheers, Andreas > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel Oops ....., Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kernel Oops ....., Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE - mkfs/growfs 32-bit inode number awareness, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID, svetljo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |