| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: About XFS-1.0.1 Kickstart |
| From: | tls@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:11:34 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <200108242055.f7OKtIp06801@xenon.niehs.nih.gov>; from krahn@xenon.niehs.nih.gov on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:55:18PM -0400 |
| References: | <200108242055.f7OKtIp06801@xenon.niehs.nih.gov> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2i |
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:55:18PM -0400, Dr. Joe Krahn (Joe) wrote: > I think the DAC960 problem relates to devfs (causes a lot > of new-user problems and maybe should be optional.) > The RAID device names are different, such as: > /dev/rd/disc0/part1 on my system. > You can also try the kernel option devfs=nomount, > but this might also cause problems with other parts > of the install process. What DAC960 problem? My machine has only a DAC960, and I installed from the 1.0.1 image with no trouble. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tera-Byte+ fileservers, Bryan-TheBS-Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | corruption of in-memory data, Florin Andrei |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS/setfacl ordering bug still? - I think I Fixed ---- I think :) - "patch" included, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | xfsrestore dumps core, Simon Matter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |