|To:||Thomas Kirk <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:10:50 +0200|
|Cc:||Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
At 16:45 23-8-2001 +0200, you wrote:
Hey there listmembers
XFS is nice for larger file sizes and also seems to do reasonably well when using large databases.
I am currently testing Progress 9 Databases (6GB of them) on a Dell Optiplex machine which now already is outperforming our production server which has twice the processor power and a scsi Raid array.
Server: Workstation: Dual PII 400 PIII 450 512MB ram 256MB ram 50GB raid5 7200RPM scsi 40GB 7200RPM IDE NCR MP-RAS SVR4 Veritas FS RedHat 7.1 with XFS
A new real server machine will be forthcoming soon which will make a decent server vs server comparison. Between a NCR Unix variant with Veritas FS and a RedHat 7.1 look-a-like with XFS.
My manager is impressed :-)
Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|