xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: libacl.lai vs. libacl.la in cmd/acl

To: Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: libacl.lai vs. libacl.la in cmd/acl
From: John Trostel <jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:57:37 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200108132023.PAA35973@slobber.americas.sgi.com>
Organization: Connex
Reply-to: John Trostel <jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 13-Aug-2001 Dean Roehrich wrote:
> 
>>From:  John Trostel <jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>When I make configure, make, make install on the ../cmd/acl directory in the
>>latest CVS of XFS, I get some warnings.  They look like this:

... snip

>>libtool: install: warning: `../libacl/libacl.la' has not been installed in
>>`/lib'
>>../install-sh -o root -g root -m 755 .libs/chacl /bin/chacl

snip..

> 
> It's not a problem.  The libacl.la hasn't been installed by that point, and
> isn't needed by then, either.
> 
> By the time all the pieces are installed everything will be where it needs to
> be.
> 
> Dean

Soooo.... when is it supposed to get installed? By the time I have finished out
of the ../cmd/acl make configure, make, make install I would think it _should_
be installed. If I am making no other utilities it would _need_ to be installed
by then.

-- 
John M. Trostel
Senior Software Engineer
Quantum / SnapAppliances
jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>