xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Problems with mkfs.xfs

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problems with mkfs.xfs
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:56:56 +0200
Cc: XFS list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200108091337.f79Dbqq04067@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:37:52AM -0500
References: <dv@vollmann.ch> <200108091337.f79Dbqq04067@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Hi Steve,

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:37:52AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> There is unfortunately no workaround for this, XFS on a floppy would
> have been a nice test bed for people, however, there are some minimum
> sizes in XFS which prevent this. For deadlock reasons, the log must be
> twice the size of the largest potential transaction we can have, this
> makes the minimum log size 1200 4K blocks which is already over 4Mbytes.

Just curious: which transaction could need 600 4K blocks? 

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>