xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsprogs support for > 1TB devices.

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsprogs support for > 1TB devices.
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 11:03:46 +0200
Cc: Ragnar Kj?rstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010809114155.C260586@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>; from nathans@sgi.com on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:41:56AM +1000
References: <20010809030249.C9580@vestdata.no> <20010809114155.C260586@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:41:56AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> I don't have access to a big enough Linux system to try it I'm
> afraid, but the IRIX/XFS code is obviously 64 bit clean, so we
> had a good starting point for Linux/XFS - the sorts of problems
> you'll encounter are likely to be issues introduced during the
> port from IRIX (like the above) or existing limitations in the
> Linux block device layer.  So, those issues aside, you shouldn't
> see any problems with XFS >2Tb. ;-)

You can simulate > 1TB block device on linux by using the loopback
device with a holey backing file. Just don't fill it.

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>