| To: | Matt Ryan <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - fix raid5 journal problems |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:17:08 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B5DCB73.73557EE8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Matt Ryan wrote: > >p.s. for those of you not following the discussion recently, the best > >performance for raid5 is an external log on a non-raid5 device, raid1 > >if you want to maintain the backup copy of the data. > > does this statement apply equally well to, say, the 1.01 release > kernels, > in addition to the cvs tree? Yes. Software raid5 that is. Cheers Seth |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - fix raid5 journal problems, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Logdev size?, Nathan Straz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - fix raid5 journal problems, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - xfsdump, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |