| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Logdev size? |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2001 09:02:52 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx> of "Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:01:00 EDT." <20010724100100.D31186@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:52:35AM -0500, > Steve Lord wrote: > > > Make sure you have the latest mkfs binary, more recent ones > > will make a better attempt at laying down the filesystem on a > > large setup like this. > > Latest CVS for mkfs, then? Hmm, 1.0.1 is probably good enough come to think of it, but I would probably go with the latest cvs kernel given the highmem/raid deadlocks which have been fixed post 1.0.1. Steve > > Andrew Klaassen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: I receive error messages "__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed", Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Logdev size?, Andrew Klaassen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Andrew Klaassen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Andrew Klaassen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |