| To: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: nfs/local performance with software raid5 and xfs and SMP |
| From: | Jani Jaakkola <jjaakkol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:27:46 +0300 (EEST) |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107231746540.4170-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Jani Jaakkola wrote:
> I'll post my benchmarks as soon as I get the new setup running.
Allright, now I did get very good benchmarks with external log, while the
RAID resync is still running:
-----snip-----
Version 1.01b ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
other-fs 2G 10161 97 42055 37 7527 8 10800 89 131575 82 317.0 1
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 2428 66 +++++ +++ 2192 57 2220 58 +++++ +++ 1510 43
-----snip-----
- Jani
|
| Previous by Date: | xfs bug ?, Mathew A. Chrystal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs bug ?, Simon Matter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: nfs/local performance with software raid5 and xfs and SMP, Jani Jaakkola |
| Next by Thread: | 1.0.1 on 2.4.6 RPMs, Dean Brissinger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |