On Jul 22, 11:57am, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> Subject: Re: TAKE - userspace
> > ...
> > Having said all that, I do agree that the static libraries should
> > go into /usr/lib - its just a matter of coercing libtool to put them
> > there or changing our own install process - I'll have a look into it
> > sometime this week.
> This is all I wanted to say before I got mislead in the technical details...
> Don't drink and email ;-)
> The patch below does work for me, it may be better to add symlinks
> of the libacl.so files to /usr/lib, too.
OK, will do.
> --- builddefs.in.orig Fri Jul 20 16:51:24 2001
> +++ builddefs.in Sun Jul 22 10:44:11 2001
Yes, this was basically what I would've done too - I'm just
not sure what will happen if the libtool archive (.la file)
is installed into a different place to where its "supposed"
to go - if you cat the .la file, you will see what I mean
here (see "libdir=").