xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - userspace

To: Juergen Hasch <Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - userspace
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:10:44 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <15O37C-1kawUrC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:12:59PM +0200
References: <200107200826.SAA36970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <15O37C-1kawUrC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
hi,

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 10:12:59PM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> Am Freitag, 20. Juli 2001 10:26 schrieb Nathan Scott:
> > Important change for xfsdump and xfsrestore (and libraries that they
> > rely on)... we're now consistent with other backup/restore utilities
> > which need be available when only the root filesystem is mounted.
> 
> What is the reason for putting libacl.a in /lib instead of leaving it in 
> /usr/lib where it belongs IMHO ?

The fundamental reason is "that's where libtool wants to put it" -
my first thoughts were that this is a strange thing also, but I can't
seem to find a way to get libtool to install the shared lib to /lib
and the static lib to /usr/lib - it seems they both have to be in the
same place.

> This breaks all applications that try to link libacl.a at compiletime like 
> Samba and Fileutils. Please move it back.

Can you elaborate on that?  (how do they break?)  They should not.

thanks.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>