| To: | Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch), John Trostel <jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx>, (Juergen Hasch) <Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - userspace |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:22:52 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <15O3tg-1LjfN2C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <XFMail.20010721165236.jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx> <XFMail.20010721165236.jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 23:03 21-7-2001 +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote: Hello John, Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2001 22:52 schrieb John Trostel: > It will NOT break Samba. The Samba check just looks to see if acl_get_file > (or whatever) is available after a -lacl compile call. If your system > looks for libraries in both /usr/lib and /lib, it will not break with the > move. It breaks for me (SuSE system). Now I don't claim to be an LSB expert, but IMHO static libraries belong in /usr/lib and shared libraries can be in /lib (important ones) or sometimes in /usr/lib. Ok, so we need some way of splitting this up. Build a patch if you want and submit it. Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - userspace, Juergen Hasch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE - userspace, John Trostel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - userspace, Juergen Hasch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE - userspace, John Trostel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |