| To: | Tru Huynh <tru@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: nfs/local performance with software raid5 and xfs and SMP |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:43:51 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> of "Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:00:36 CDT." <200107201600.f6KG0aG32766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Just one comment here, the configuration in case c) is never a good idea, > the raid code will automatically cause the disk head to thrash around > that is why the performance is so bad there. I am not totally sure why > we can do a reasonable job on deletes on a single disk, but not on a > raid - there are synchronous writes in there. Unless your single disk > xfs is on ide with write caching turned on. One more comment on xfs > delete speed is that multiple parallel threads doing deletes will > run faster than a single thread doing deletes, so lots of different > threads doing deletes will not be as bad as a single large directory > delete. > > Steve > I made a mistake here I meant config b) not c) - it looks like write caching is on in this case. Steve |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs?, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (fwd), Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: nfs/local performance with software raid5 and xfs and SMP, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: nfs/local performance with software raid5 and xfs and SMP, Jani Jaakkola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |