| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: External log and possibilities. |
| From: | Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:33:56 +0100 (BST) |
| In-reply-to: | <001d01c110e0$78a0b000$3c532840@towerpc> |
| References: | <001d01c110e0$78a0b000$3c532840@towerpc> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 01:54:42 -0400 Steven Tower <Steven Tower
<tower@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> I want wondering if anyone here was aware of non-volatile RAM devices
> 128m-1g and would such a device work with Linux and then allow you to
> use an external log to read/write to them. I would expect that if it's
> based on SDRAM, etc it would make for some interesting performance
> gains.
> Anyone have any thoughts on this?
If you are talking about Flash then it has the limitation of a fairly
small max numbr of write cycles. I have heard 100,000 quoted - not
much for a busy fileserver.
--
Keith Matthews Spam trap - my real account at this
node is keith_m
Frequentous Consultants - Linux Services,
Oracle development & database administration
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Samba 2.2.1 RPMS with ACL, Mads Peter Bach |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Bug in RedHat 7.1 Installer 1.01, Robert Lindebaum |
| Previous by Thread: | External log and possibilities., Steven Tower |
| Next by Thread: | Re: External log and possibilities., Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |