| To: | "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsrestore (Linux) generating Amanda's index |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:57:35 -0500 |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, "amanda-users@xxxxxxxxxx" <amanda-users@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Message from "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx> of "Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:53:24 +0200." <3B54C1E4.ECD9EC9F@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Is this actually causing problems, or is it just a query as to why > > you see the odd names? > > Just being curious... I haven't recognized any problems yet. It just > causes an annoying listing of mangled filenames in addition to the > original filename in the index, my SysOps will ask me "How can we rely > on it if it's messing up the index? Does it mess up the backup, too?" > and I have to write some more lines in the documentation just to ignore > these offset names... I guess if the dump was being split over multiple tape files then it would be useful to see the fact that a file was split between them. This may be the original intent of the output. Are you using real tape media, or a file, I suspect the file case could be smart enough not to do the split as it does not make a whole lot of sense there. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsrestore (Linux) generating Amanda's index, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | dumping multiple sessions to a single tape with XFS dump., Gonyou, Austin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsrestore (Linux) generating Amanda's index, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfsrestore (Linux) generating Amanda's index, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |