| To: | Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks |
| From: | Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 16 Jul 2001 11:28:55 -0700 |
| Cc: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B507259.4436853E@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.BSI.4.10.10107141752080.18419-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B507259.4436853E@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 14 Jul 2001 18:24:57 +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote: > > Seth Mos wrote: > > > On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Xuan Baldauf wrote: > > > > > > I do not use XFS, currently. Why is XFS better for Samba? > > > > Because word documents average 0.1 - 1MB. > > Ah. So you just mean speed (quantity), not some features (quality)- Features also: ACLs. ;-) -- Florin Andrei |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS performance, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | fine-tuning XFS, Florin Andrei |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks, Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks, Chris Mason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |