| To: | Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks |
| From: | Ragnar Kjørstad <reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Jul 2001 02:57:25 +0200 |
| Cc: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B507259.4436853E@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from Xuan Baldauf on Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 06:24:57PM +0200 |
| References: | <Pine.BSI.4.10.10107141752080.18419-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B507259.4436853E@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 06:24:57PM +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote: > > > I do not use XFS, currently. Why is XFS better for Samba? > > > > Because word documents average 0.1 - 1MB. > > Ah. So you just mean speed (quantity), not some features (quality)- Also XFS supports ACLs, that may be a important feature for some windows-users. -- Ragnar Kjorstad Big Storage |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks, Hans Reiser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Tulip driver in 2.4.7-pre6-xfs b0rken, Juha Saarinen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks, Rahul Jain |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks, Florin Andrei |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |