[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks

To: Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 17:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3B5023C6.5A6333BC@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Xuan Baldauf wrote:
> Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> > For your Squid cache, don't go XFS, but instead go ReiserFS. It will do a 
> > great
> > job there. For your Samba or NFS partition, go XFS and not ReiserFS.
> I do not use XFS, currently. Why is XFS better for Samba?

Because word documents average 0.1 - 1MB.

> > Aside from
> > the fact that ReiserFS is having problems with NFS (and SFS which runs on 
> > top
> > of NFS),
> NFS has problems with ReiserFS (NFS has design bugs which do not seem to 
> matter on
> other filesystems).

Dare to say that it was designed for Unix like file systems with inodes?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>