[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted"

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted"
From: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:02:10 +1200 (NZST)
Cc: Jarkko Santala <jake@xxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200107122010.f6CKAYU06031@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Steve Lord wrote:

> There is an updated compiler from redhat, they released an update and
> there is an even more recent one in rawhide. I regularly compile with
> these and do nfs exports - it has been a long time since I used the
> original 7.1 gcc though, and I cannot say I ever compiled that
> particular code combination with that compiler. The fact that different
> build architectures exhibit different compiler issues does not help
> either. For the record I am running the cvs kernel compiled with
> gcc-2.96-88 on a dual processor i686 kernel. I have nfs exports from
> this box. Oh, another variable is if you build in kdb and tell it to
> put frame pointers in the kernel, this chews up more registers and
> changes the code quite a bit, I do not use the frame pointer option.

I've found that -88 builds a stable XFS system (this is using the CVS
code), whereas earlier RHL 2.96 gccs didn't. My system's a dual P3 with
SCSI and IDE drives.



PGP fingerprint:
B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502  10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>