| To: | cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:50:52 +0200 |
| Cc: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3B4DDDDE.4574DCB@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 12:26:54PM -0500 |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010712113132.02b59f00@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B4DDDDE.4574DCB@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 12:26:54PM -0500, cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Actually since the BSD vfs/vnode/VM interface is much closer to IRIX it > shouldn't be nearly as much work. It would be great if someone would do a FreeBSD port of XFS. Linux has benefitted a lot in the past from competive benchmarking and tuning with FreeBSD (and I guess FreeBSD has too). With a good file system like XFS on both Linux and FreeBSD it would be even easier to do that and get one variable out of the way. So I think even for completely selfish reasons on the Linux side a FreeBSD port would be a good thing. -Andi (back to lurking now) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted", Jarkko Santala |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted", Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD?, cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD?, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |