| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? |
| From: | Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:06:39 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107121128560.11437-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107121128560.11437-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:29:17 +0200 (CEST), you wrote: >wondering, while we are off topic, why SGI didn't try and port Irix to >intel architecture? Or will it get ported to IA64? Irix will remain as MIPS only. My understanding is that it was decided it would take too much work to port Irix to a non-MIPS processor. Instead SGI decided to help in improving Linux in areas SGI felt were necessary for the Linux offerings by SGI. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD?, Gerald Henriksen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: System locking: kernel-2.4.6pre3-xfs, Luc Lalonde |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD?, Adam Cioccarelli |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD?, Thomas Duffy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |