xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released
From: "Ries van Twisk" <ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:18:40 +0200
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010711124947.032a2cb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3B4C427F.7702.448435@localhost>
Reply-to: ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
O>Currently it's runing for 14 day's now without problems.
> 
> The problem is not really with the raid hardware itself but the driver.
> When they resolve that we will use it again. There have been reports of 
> corruption under high load. See http://domsch.com/linux/
Th only problem with data curruption are the access database file but that is 
really a Samba problem. So far no problem found. But my system runs under 
low loads about 25 Samba users on a 10Mb network.

> >I also applied the XFS patch to the Linux 2.4.5 kernel.
> >It all compiles fine now.
> 
> Always make sure to use kgcc for production systems.
Never know that there was a kgcc version! I just use gcc version 2.95.2.

> 
> >It's not tested on my PE 2400 server yet but the kernel itself works great on
> >a test IDE systeem.
> 
> It should work fine, we have two 2450 servers running at work but with a 
> AMI megaraid. I got tired of each patching my kernel for every new version 
> with the aacraid patch.
I just upgraded it to 2.4.5 and want to install xfs on it as soon as Samba 
compiles fine with acl from xfs. That I'll leave it alone again. 
> 
> >I'm currently buzy to compiling Samba aswell but I still have some problems
> >with ACL.
> 
> 2.2.1 I presume? I did download it but I will have to see of it compiles 
> under NCR Unix first.
Yes a 2.2.1 version. But it does not compile with acl support :-(

Samba expect the files in sys/ and not in acl/ and the header file are 
different.

Ries


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>