xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found
From: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:28:34 +1200 (NZST)
Cc: "JHamilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <JHamilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010709112339.034083d8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Seth Mos wrote:

> But in general XFS does not like 2.96 and you should avoid it for your
> critical data. Feel free to use it on your test machines but avoid it for
> production machines.

Yes... but if you say that, you should try to explain why. Unfortunately,
I haven't been able to pinpoint the change between -85 and -88 that made
all the difference between a stable system, and one that suffered file
system corruption very easily. It could be the newer CVS code as well, but
I don't know for sure.

-- 
Regards,


Juha

PGP fingerprint:
B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502  10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>