| To: | Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:25:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | "JHamilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <JHamilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107092102480.326-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx rg> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010709105253.02ac25e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 21:04 9-7-2001 +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote: On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Seth Mos wrote:> If you compiled it yourself I hope you did that using kgcc on redhat systems.> gcc-2.96-whatever is still not safe for data integrity. Not sure -- my system's been OK with gcc 2.96-88 from Red Hat Rawhide. The stock RH gcc 2.96-85 isn't happy with XFS though. But in general XFS does not like 2.96 and you should avoid it for your critical data. Feel free to use it on your test machines but avoid it for production machines. -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found, Juha Saarinen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found, Juha Saarinen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found, Juha Saarinen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Help... Everything moved to lost&found, Juha Saarinen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |