xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: More on write caching

To: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: More on write caching
From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 22:30:45 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107070908560.326-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107070908560.326-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 09:12:48 +1200 (NZST) Juha Saarinen <Juha Saarinen 
<juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Steve Lord wrote:

> > Using the rotational power of the spindle to
> > generate power to move the head to a special track and flush the cache
> > is not unheard of for instance.

> My systems integrator friend tells me that certain drives from IBM have
> large capacitors, which come in handy when the power goes out all of a
> sudden.

> For obvious reasons, if the drives are connected to a caching controller,
> make sure you have an UPS as well...


Or ensure it is a battery-backed cache on the controller.
Problem is these are the expensive ones.

If you do use an UPS, ensure it is a good one. I have seen
large systems brought down just because one part of the UPS
failed. I also know of a site that had a major fire caused
by the UPS.


--
Keith Matthews                  Spam trap - my real account at this 
                                                        node is keith_m
Frequentous Consultants  - Linux Services, 
                Oracle development & database administration



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>