[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS compatibility with 2.4.6

To: Mathias Herberts <Mathias.Herberts@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS compatibility with 2.4.6
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 09:20:43 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from Mathias Herberts <Mathias.Herberts@xxxxxx> of "Fri, 06 Jul 2001 09:23:06 +0200." <3B45675A.5EEDBD0F@xxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
> I gave 2.4.6 and XFS a few tries but to no avail, the 2.4.6 xfs-cvs
> patch available on your ftp site seems to break the kernel build process
> when jointly applied with JFS 1.0.0 and LVM 0.9.1b7.
> The 2.4.5 patch worked ok with the 2.4.5 kernel, but the 2.4.6 patch
> seems to be broken.

You need to be a bit more explicit in what you mean by breaks the build
process, plus you are in effect applying two lvm patches. The xfs kernel
contains 0.9.1_beta6 while the base kernel still contains 0.9.1_beta2, so
applying 0.9.1b7 is not that straight forward, plus, as Seth already
pointed out, we have more than just a different revision of lvm in


> Any hint on how to put JFS/XFS and the last LVM in the 2.4.6 kernel?
> JFS and LVM 0.9.1b7 do work ok in the 2.4.6 kernel.
> Best regards and thanks for releasing XFS for Linux.
> Mathias Herberts.
> --
> Ce message et  toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres  le "message") sont
> confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
> Toute  utilisation ou  diffusion  non autorisee  est interdite.   Tout
> message  etant  susceptible  d'alteration,  l'emetteur  decline  toute
> responsabilite au titre de  ce message  s'il a  ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie.
>                 -----------------------------------
> This message and any  attachments (the "message") are confidential and
> intended  solely   for  the   addressees.  Any  unauthorised   use  or
> dissemination is prohibited. As e-mails are susceptible to alteration,
> the issuer shall  not be  liable for  the  message if altered, changed
> or falsified.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>