| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree? |
| From: | Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Jul 2001 01:13:25 +0200 |
| Cc: | kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Fang Han <dfbb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010705234532.A16619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Andi Kleen on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:45:32PM +0200 |
| References: | <20010705151357.A2773@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B4417D5.ECDC1125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010705101747.A32674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010705234137.E28075@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20010705234532.A16619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:45:32PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:41:37PM +0200, Ragnar Kjørstad wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:17:47AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > All block devices in a XFS kernel need a special patch to add an ioctl > > > to set the logical block size. The original poster probably didn't add > > > that ioctl to his new hacked in LVM; which will cause all kinds of > > > problems with xfs user tools and also probably file system corruption. > > > > Is there a patch to add this ioctl to lvm? > > Yes, just diff the XFS tree against a Linus tree. Now I'm confused. If the fix is in the XFS tree, why is it not in the XFS-patch? was the fix just commited? -- Ragnar Kjorstad Big Storage |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | minor typo in PR3, Thomas Duffy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | scsi module sym53c8xx fails on 1.0.1 PR3, Thomas Duffy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?, Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |