xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?
From: Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:41:37 +0200
Cc: kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Fang Han <dfbb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010705101747.A32674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Andi Kleen on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:17:47AM +0200
References: <20010705151357.A2773@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B4417D5.ECDC1125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010705101747.A32674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:17:47AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> All block devices in a XFS kernel need a special patch to add an ioctl
> to set the logical block size. The original poster probably didn't add
> that ioctl to his new hacked in LVM; which will cause all kinds of 
> problems with xfs user tools and also probably file system corruption.

Is there a patch to add this ioctl to lvm?

Exactly what filesystem corruption will it cause, and under what
circumstances?

If this is serious, maybe mkfs.xfs should refuse to build a filesystem
on a device that doesn't support the ioctl?



-- 
Ragnar Kjorstad
Big Storage

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>