| To: | kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:17:47 +0200 |
| Cc: | Fang Han <dfbb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3B4417D5.ECDC1125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:31:33AM +0200 |
| References: | <20010705151357.A2773@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B4417D5.ECDC1125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:31:33AM +0200, kris buggenhout wrote: > Fang Han wrote: > > > > Now I use it myself, But it is very buggy, xfs_growfs can't work twice, > > Not entirely true, if U run an xfsrepair on a growed fs .. next time > it'll work... > Something in the cleanup of growfs is not happening I guess > > > mkfs.xfs can't set block size..... > > Which version... I can set block size's /// to any All block devices in a XFS kernel need a special patch to add an ioctl to set the logical block size. The original poster probably didn't add that ioctl to his new hacked in LVM; which will cause all kinds of problems with xfs user tools and also probably file system corruption. > > When XFS cvs tree will move to LVM-0.9.1_beta7? My guess is when Linus does; as maintaining any more changes to Linus than necessary is a lot of work. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?, Fang Han |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - xfsdump/restore/librmt, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?, Fang Han |
| Next by Thread: | Re: When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?, Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |