| To: | Nikita Danilov <NikitaDanilov@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ACL_OTHER_OBJ? |
| From: | Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch) |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jul 2001 13:59:35 +0200 |
| Cc: | Nikita Danilov <NikitaDanilov@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <15167.1533.474006.929684@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <15167.1533.474006.929684@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Am Sonntag, 1. Juli 2001 13:14 schrieb Nikita Danilov: > Hello, > > I have been looking through XFS code and seen that include/acl.h > declares ACL_OTHER_OBJ macro. My copy of POSIX.1e/D17 only mentions > ACL_OTHER (23.2.5, table 23-3). Was there some further development of > the standard or you just decided to make naming more consistent? ACL_OTHER_OBJ was originally defined by SGI, while ACL_OTHER is how Posix calls it. It was added for compatibility. > BTW, is there some description of NT ACL API in more usable form than > pages from msdn site? You might ask the Samba people on the samba or samba-technical mailing list. ...Juergen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS vs. JFS, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: compile failure in current CVSup, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | ACL_OTHER_OBJ?, Nikita Danilov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Filesystem on XFS partition no longer accessible afterwritin, s-luppescu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |