| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | ACL_OTHER_OBJ? |
| From: | Nikita Danilov <NikitaDanilov@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jul 2001 15:14:05 +0400 |
| Cc: | Nikita Danilov <NikitaDanilov@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello, I have been looking through XFS code and seen that include/acl.h declares ACL_OTHER_OBJ macro. My copy of POSIX.1e/D17 only mentions ACL_OTHER (23.2.5, table 23-3). Was there some further development of the standard or you just decided to make naming more consistent? BTW, is there some description of NT ACL API in more usable form than pages from msdn site? (Please, CC responses to NikitaDanilov@xxxxxxxxxx) Nikita |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS vs. JFS, Juha Saarinen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: compile failure in current CVSup, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS vs. JFS, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ACL_OTHER_OBJ?, Juergen Hasch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |