| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Logdev size? |
| From: | Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:52:59 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <200107241352.f6ODqZJ23995@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200107241352.f6ODqZJ23995@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:52:35AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > So a mkfs line along the lines of: > > mkfs -t xfs -f -i size=512 -l size=16384b /dev/xxx Hmmm. size 16384b specified for log subvolume is too large, maximum is 16032 blocks Is this a hard limit? (This is with the latest mkfs from a CVS from today.) Andrew Klaassen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: about the new 1.0.1 installer update disk, Thomas Duffy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: about the new 1.0.1 installer update disk, Andrew Klaassen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Nathan Straz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |