Re: TAKE - fix raid5 journal problems

[Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>]

> >p.s. for those of you not following the discussion recently, the best
> >performance for raid5 is an external log on a non-raid5 device, raid1
> >if you want to maintain the backup copy of the data.
> 
> does this statement apply equally well to, say, the 1.01 release
> kernels,
> in addition to the cvs tree?

Probably even more so, with a combination of local and remote access
we managed to hang a 1.0.1 raid volume pretty hard.

Steve

> 
> thanks,
> Matt